Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841626›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2024

Multi-omic profiling reveals potential biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis and therapy response among mitochondria-associated cell death genes in the context of 3P medicine.

Dingtao Hu, Xu Shen, Peng Gao, Tiantian Mao, Yuan Chen, Xiaofeng Li, Weifeng Shen, Yugang Zhuang, Jin Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-omics profiling reveals that ScissorCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cancer therapy resistance from a spatial-omics perspective.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dingtao HuClinical Cancer Institute, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.
Xu ShenClinical Cancer Institute, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.
Peng GaoClinical Cancer Institute, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.
Tiantian MaoDepartment of Emergency, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072 China.
Yuan ChenClinical Cancer Institute, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Emergency, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072 China.
Weifeng ShenThe Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yugang ZhuangDepartment of Emergency, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072 China.
Jin DingClinical Cancer Institute, Center for Translational Medicine, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer cell growth, metastasis, and drug resistance are major challenges in treating liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). However, the lack of comprehensive and reliable models hamper the effectiveness of the predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM) strategy in managing LIHC. Methods: Leveraging seven distinct patterns of mitochondrial cell death (MCD), we conducted a multi-omic screening of MCD-related genes. A novel machine learning framework was developed, integrating 10 machine learning algorithms with 67 different combinations to establish a consensus mitochondrial cell death index (MCDI). This index underwent rigorous evaluation across training, validation, and in-house clinical cohorts. A comprehensive multi-omics analysis encompassing bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics was employed to achieve a deeper insight into the constructed signature. The response of risk subgroups to immunotherapy and targeted therapy was evaluated and validated. RT-qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemical staining were utilized for findings validation. Results: Nine critical differentially expressed MCD-related genes were identified in LIHC. A consensus MCDI was constructed based on a 67-combination machine learning computational framework, demonstrating outstanding performance in predicting prognosis and clinical translation. MCDI correlated with immune infiltration, Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score and sorafenib sensitivity. Findings were validated experimentally. Moreover, we identified PAK1IP1 as the most important gene for predicting LIHC prognosis and validated its potential as an indicator of prognosis and sorafenib response in our in-house clinical cohorts. Conclusion: This study developed a novel predictive model for LIHC, namely MCDI. Incorporating MCDI into the PPPM framework will enhance clinical decision-making processes and optimize individualized treatment strategies for LIHC patients. Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00362-8.

Indexed as

Achine learningEll deathLiver hepatocellular carcinomaMmunotherapyOrafenibPredictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM / 3PM)Ulti-omic

Identifiers

PMID38841626
PMCPMC11147991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.