Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841624›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2024

Clinically relevant immune subtypes based on alternative splicing landscape of immune-related genes for lung cancer advanced PPPM approach.

Na Li, Wenshuang Jia, Jiahong Wang, Qianwen Shao, Xiaoxia Feng, Zhijun Li, Wenhao Sun, Ming Kang, Dongming Hu, Ligang Xing and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Na LiShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Wenshuang JiaShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Jiahong WangCancer Research Institute, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Baiyun Road 1083, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515 People's Republic of China.
Qianwen ShaoShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Xiaoxia FengShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Zhijun LiShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Wenhao SunShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Ming KangShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Dongming HuShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Ligang XingShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.
Xianquan ZhanShandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250117 People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alternative splicing (AS) occurs in the process of gene post-transcriptional process, which is very important for the correct synthesis and function of protein. The change of AS pattern may lead to the change of expression level or function of lung cancer-related genes, and then affect the occurrence and development of lung cancers. The specific AS pattern might be used as a biomarker for early warning and prognostic assessment of a cancer in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM; 3PM). AS events of immune-related genes (IRGs) were closely associated with tumor progression and immunotherapy. We hypothesize that IRG-AS events are significantly different in lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) vs. controls or in lung squamous cell carcinomas (LUSCs) vs. controls. IRG-AS alteration profiling was identified to construct IRG-differentially expressed AS (IRG-DEAS) signature models. Study on the selective AS events of specific IRGs in lung cancer patients might be of great significance for further exploring the pathogenesis of lung cancer, realizing early detection and effective monitoring of lung cancer, finding new therapeutic targets, overcoming drug resistance, and developing more effective therapeutic strategies, and better used for the prediction, diagnosis, prevention, and personalized medicine of lung cancer. Methods: The transcriptomic, clinical, and AS data of LUADs and LUSCs were downloaded from TCGA and its SpliceSeq databases. IRG-DEAS events were identified in LUAD and LUSC, followed by their functional characteristics, and overall survival (OS) analyses. OS-related IRG-DEAS prognostic models were constructed for LUAD and LUSC with Lasso regression, which were used to classify LUADs and LUSCs into low- and high-risk score groups. Furthermore, the immune cell distribution, immune-related scores, drug sensitivity, mutation status, and GSEA/GSVA status were analyzed between low- and high-risk score groups. Also, low- and high-immunity clusters and AS factor (SF)-OS-related-AS co-expression network and verification of cell function of CELF6 were analyzed in LUAD and LUSC. Results: Comprehensive analysis of transcriptomic, clinical, and AS data of LUADs and LUSCs identified IRG-AS events in LUAD ( Conclusions: This study established two reliable IRG-DEAS signature prognostic models and constructed interesting splicing factor-splicing event networks in LUAD and LUSC, which can be used to construct clinically relevant immune subtypes, patient stratification, prognostic prediction, and personalized medical services in the PPPM practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00366-4.

Indexed as

Alternative splicingClinical characteristicsClinically relevant immune subtypesImmune-related geneLung adenocarcinomasLung cancerLung squamous cell carcinomasNonnegative matrix factorization method (NMF)Patient stratificationPersonalized medical servicesPredictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM; 3PM)Prognostic assessmentSplicing factorTumor microenvironmentWeighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA)

Identifiers

PMID38841624
PMCPMC11147996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.