ArticleRadiology case reports2024
Non-hemorrhagic cerebellar contrast enhancement on intraoperative MRI during a supratentorial glioma resection: Concerning finding of no significance.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a powerful tool used to verify maximal safe resection of gliomas. However, unsuspected new or incidental findings can present difficult clinical scenarios. Here we present a case of a large supratentorial glioma resection where new, incidental bilateral cerebellar hemispheric enhancement was noted on iMRI. A 52-year-old male with a large intra-axial mass spanning the right temporal and parietal lobes underwent a craniotomy for tumor resection utilizing iMRI. Imaging displayed new, remote, bilateral cerebellar enhancement. Upon completion of surgery, the patient was extubated and was at his neurological baseline. An immediate CT scan showed no abnormalities in the cerebellum, and the duration of his hospital stay was unaffected by this finding. An MRI 24 hours after the procedure demonstrated complete resolution of the enhancement. New, remote contrast enhancement in the cerebellum raises concerns for the potentially emergent, well-defined pathology known as remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH). However, here we describe a case where these findings turned out to be clinically insignificant, CT-negative, and self-limiting. Therefore, here we call this finding remote non-hemorrhagic cerebellar contrast enhancement (RNHCCE) to differentiate it from RCE, and we discuss nuances and management considerations for differentiating the two.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.