ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Advancing NSCLC pathological subtype prediction with interpretable machine learning: a comprehensive radiomics-based approach.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, deployment, and feature interpretability of a three-class prediction model for pulmonary diseases.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Translational impact of machine learning-driven predictive modeling with pathway-based plasma metabolomic biomarkers for lung cancer detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to develop and assess the performance of interpretable machine learning models for diagnosing three histological subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) utilizing CT imaging data. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 317 patients diagnosed with NSCLC was included in the study. These individuals were randomly segregated into two groups: a training set comprising 222 patients and a validation set with 95 patients, adhering to a 7:3 ratio. A comprehensive extraction yielded 1,834 radiomic features. For feature selection, statistical methodologies such as the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation, and one-way logistic regression were employed. To address data imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was utilized. The study designed three distinct models to predict adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and large cell carcinoma (LCC). Six different classifiers, namely Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and LightGBM, were deployed for model training. Model performance was gauged through accuracy metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). To interpret the diagnostic process, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach was applied. Results: For the ADC, SCC, and LCC groups, 9, 12, and 8 key radiomic features were selected, respectively. In terms of model performance, the XGB model demonstrated superior performance in predicting SCC and LCC, with AUC values of 0.789 and 0.848, respectively. For ADC prediction, the Random Forest model excelled, showcasing an AUC of 0.748. Conclusion: The constructed machine learning models, leveraging CT imaging, exhibited robust predictive capabilities for SCC, LCC, and ADC subtypes of NSCLC. These interpretable models serve as substantial support for clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.