Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841566›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Methods and baseline characteristics for a social engagement technology-based randomized controlled trial for older adults.

Elizabeth A Lydon, George Mois, Shraddha A Shende, Dillon Myers, Margaret K Danilovich, Wendy A Rogers, Raksha A Mudar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05380180 (Enhancing Quality of Life for Older Adults With and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05380180 nacompletednot on this map

Enhancing Quality of Life for Older Adults With and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Through Social Engagement Over Video Technology

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRan2022 to 2023Enrolled99ConditionsAging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Aging WellArmsOneClick Social Engagement Intervention, OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Extension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth A LydonCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
George MoisCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Shraddha A ShendeCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Dillon MyersOneClick.chat, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margaret K DanilovichCJE SeniorLife, Chicago, IL, USA.
Wendy A RogersCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Raksha A MudarCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence suggests that increasing opportunities for social engagement has the potential to support successful aging. However, many older adults may have limited access to in-person social engagement opportunities due to barriers such as transportation. We outline the development, design, methodology, and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial that assessed the benefits of a social engagement intervention delivered through the OneClick video conferencing platform to older adults with varying levels of cognitive functioning. Methods: Community-dwelling older adults with and without cognitive challenges were randomly assigned to a social engagement intervention group or a waitlist control group. Participants were asked to attend twice-weekly social engagement events for 8 weeks via OneClick. Outcomes included social engagement and technology acceptance for both groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 assessments. As an extension, the waitlist control group had an opportunity to participate in the intervention, with outcomes assessed at weeks 12 and 16. Results: We randomly assigned 99 participants (mean age = 74.1 ± 6.7, range: 60-99), with 50 in the immediate intervention group and 49 in the waitlist control group. About half of the participants reported living alone (53.5%), with a third (31%) falling into the cognitively impaired range on global cognitive screening. The groups did not differ at baseline on any of the outcome measures. Conclusions: Outcomes from this study will provide important information regarding the feasibility and efficacy of providing technology-based social engagement interventions to older adults with a range of cognitive abilities.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentOlder adultsRandomized controlled trialSocial engagementTechnologyVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID38841566
PMCPMC11152901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.