Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841565›Full record

ArticleJournal for person-oriented research2024

Comment on Lundh (2023).

S G Hofmann, B Pereira, C Barbosa, C E Lindsay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for person-oriented research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The 10th yearly volume of JPOR is complete.Journal for person-oriented research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S G HofmannPhilipps-University of Marburg, Department of Psychology, Translational Clinical Psychology Group, Marburg, Germany.
B PereiraPhilipps-University of Marburg, Department of Psychology, Translational Clinical Psychology Group, Marburg, Germany.
C BarbosaPhilipps-University of Marburg, Department of Psychology, Translational Clinical Psychology Group, Marburg, Germany.
C E LindsayPhilipps-University of Marburg, Department of Psychology, Translational Clinical Psychology Group, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this commentary of Lundh's (2023) article, we point to an individualized process-based approach for the future of psychotherapy. The traditional nomothetic research paradigm is limiting our understanding of processes of change, oversimplifying psychological phenomena, and neglecting individual dynamics. In contrast, a process-based approach calls for ideographic methodologies, departing from the latent-disease paradigm toward process-based interventions. Process-based research promises avenues for enhancing intervention science and a deeper comprehension about psychopathology and therapeutic mechanisms, in a comprehensive, personalized, and holistic manner.

Indexed as

idiographic designperson-levelprocess-based approachpsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38841565
PMCPMC11149404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.