Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841511›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Application of deep learning classification model for regional evaluation of roof pressure support evolution effects over time in coal mining face.

Hao-Jie Li, Xiang Fu, Yi-Fan Qin, Si-Feng Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao-Jie LiCollege of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Xiang FuCollege of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Yi-Fan QinCollege of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Si-Feng JiaCollege of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydraulic support leg pressure serves as a crucial indicator for assessing work face support quality. Current evaluation methods for support quality primarily concentrate on static analyses-like inadequate initial support force, pressure overrun, and uneven bracket force-while neglecting dynamic column pressure changes. This paper introduces a model for assessing hydraulic support quality using deep learning techniques. Real-time data is preprocessed into a spatio-temporal pressure sub-matrix sample, which is then inputted into the model. This process assesses the support quality type and characterizes its dynamic evolution within the area. The model facilitates the identification of dynamic support quality effects in the working face area, aiding operators in making targeted adjustments to hydraulic support status. Experimental results revealed that the optimized LeNet-5 network-adjusting parameters like convolutional layer count, kernel size, and ReLU activation function-achieved the highest classification accuracy of 85.25 % for support quality, surpassed other networks. Furthermore, the improved LeNet-5 network outperformed other networks in both F1 score and recall. Additionally, the improved LeNet-5 network achieved faster convergence to the optimal solution, accelerated training speed. This highlighted its advantages in evaluating the spatio-temporal support quality of hydraulic supports in smart mining operations.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkImproved LeNet-5 networkLeg pressureSmart mining faceSpatio-temporal support quality

Identifiers

PMID38841511
PMCPMC11152685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.