ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of deep learning classification model for regional evaluation of roof pressure support evolution effects over time in coal mining face.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asynchronous Monitoring-Induced Deviation in Hydraulic Support Peak Estimation and Its Sensitivity to Synchronization and Sampling Resolution: A Case Study of a Solid Backfilling Working Face.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hydraulic support pressure prediction via deep learning with multilevel temporal feature integration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydraulic support leg pressure serves as a crucial indicator for assessing work face support quality. Current evaluation methods for support quality primarily concentrate on static analyses-like inadequate initial support force, pressure overrun, and uneven bracket force-while neglecting dynamic column pressure changes. This paper introduces a model for assessing hydraulic support quality using deep learning techniques. Real-time data is preprocessed into a spatio-temporal pressure sub-matrix sample, which is then inputted into the model. This process assesses the support quality type and characterizes its dynamic evolution within the area. The model facilitates the identification of dynamic support quality effects in the working face area, aiding operators in making targeted adjustments to hydraulic support status. Experimental results revealed that the optimized LeNet-5 network-adjusting parameters like convolutional layer count, kernel size, and ReLU activation function-achieved the highest classification accuracy of 85.25 % for support quality, surpassed other networks. Furthermore, the improved LeNet-5 network outperformed other networks in both F1 score and recall. Additionally, the improved LeNet-5 network achieved faster convergence to the optimal solution, accelerated training speed. This highlighted its advantages in evaluating the spatio-temporal support quality of hydraulic supports in smart mining operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.