Immune checkpoint inhibitors and renal toxicity.

F Bocchi, S Häfliger, S Schmid, D Sidler

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Growth of Renal Cancer Cell Lines Is Strongly Inhibited by Synergistic Activity of Low-Dosed Amygdalin and Sulforaphane.Nutrients · 2024
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F BocchiDepartment for Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

S HäfligerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

S SchmidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

D SidlerDepartment for Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of a broad spectrum of cancers as metastatic melanoma, non-small lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma. These humanized monoclonal antibodies target immune-regulatory receptors expressed on T lymphocytes, antigen presenting cells and tumor cells and induce an immunological anti-tumor response. If on the one hand these molecules have led to considerable improvement in survival outcomes, on the other hand these therapies can be associated with immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). While these side effects have become well known, the best diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are still under investigation. The authors discuss pathophysiology, clinical presentation and histological features of ICIs renal toxicity. Furthermore, we focus on kidney transplant (KT) recipients, including the therapeutic adaptation approach to immunosuppression and the risk of rejection.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryImmune checkpoint inhibitorsRechallengingRenal transplant

Identifiers

PMID38841501

DOI10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31911

PMCPMC11152715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.