ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in treating RET-altered MTC: A single-arm meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted therapy in thyroid cancer: molecular alterations and clinical management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- How Tumors Affect Hemodynamics: A Diffusion Study on the Zebrafish Transplantable Model of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Selpercatinib is effective in the treatment of RET-altered medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in the treatment of patients with RET-altered MTC. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to April 5, 2024. Outcomes included complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). We carried out a meta-analysis of these studies and exploratory subgroup analyses. The effect sizes for all pooled results were presented as 95% confidence intervals with upper and lower limits. Results: The pooled CR, PR, and SD rates for all patients were 10%, 59%, and 26%, respectively. The pooled ORR in all patients was 70%, while the pooled ORR in pre-treated and non-pre-treated groups were 67% and 70%, respectively. The pooled DCR in all patients was 95%, while the pooled DCR in pre-treated and non-pre-treated groups were 96% and 95%, respectively. The most common AEs associated with selpercatinib were hypertension, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased. Conclusion: Selpercatinib offers significant benefits to patients with RET-altered MTC with assessable CR, PR, SD, ORR, and grade 3-4 AEs; however, treatment-related AEs should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.