Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841438›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Social support and audience engagement of lupus-related posts on social networking sites in China.

Cheng Cheng, Rita Espanha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cheng ChengBeijing Information Science and Technology University, China.
Rita EspanhaUniversity Institute of Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lupus, known as a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease, has become more common in China currently. Above all, most Chinese Lupus patients haven't ample knowledge and adequate understanding of this complicated chronic disease. In recent years, social networking sites have created an interactive environment in which patients can obtain health information and also can exchange personal experiences with others having similar health concerns. Objective: The overall aim of this study is to develop a better understanding of the social support requested and received during the routine social media use of lupus activists and their referents. In other words. This paper seeks to explore whether the lupus-related posts disseminated on the Sina microblog platform can serve and satisfy the needs of this group. Methods: Content analysis and descriptive analysis were conducted to ascertain the core topics of lupus-related posts on the Sina microblog. Chi-square tests were performed to determine the differences in types of social support between provision and request groups, as well as engaged and non-engaged groups. Finally, negative binomial regression was undertaken to investigate which types of social support generated more audience engagement. Results: By analyzing 9822 lupus-related posts derived from the Sina microblog, disease description was the most prominent theme. Evidence is presented which shows that information support was requested and supplied more frequently than emotional and instrumental support. Specifically, information support was provided more than requested, while the instrumental and emotional support provisions were less numerous than the requests. Analysis revealed that posts containing information support provisions attracted more engagement than those with the other five types of social support. Conclusions: Social networking sites play a critical role on disseminating lupus-related information and provide an interactive space in which users can freely communicate their health conditions and seek peer support. However, health practitioners not only have to present more communication strategies to provide emotional and instrumental support through social media, but also have to boost audience engagement.

Indexed as

Lupus patients (19)Lupus-related posts (19)Sina microblog (20)Social media (19)Social networking (19)Social support (41)

Identifiers

PMID38841438
PMCPMC11152929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.