Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841382›Full record

ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2024

Effects of a relined fiberglass post with conventional and self-adhesive resin cement.

Wilton Lima Dos Santos Junior, Marina Rodrigues Santi, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilton Lima Dos Santos JuniorOperative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0074-9292
Marina Rodrigues SantiOperative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-2389
Rodrigo Barros Esteves LinsOperative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-6578
Luís Roberto Marcondes MartinsOperative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-4540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of relined and non-relined fiberglass posts when cemented to root canal dentin using a conventional dual-cure resin cement or a self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and Methods: Two types of resin cements were utilized: conventional and self-adhesive. Additionally, 2 cementation protocols were employed, involving relined and non-relined fiberglass posts. In total, 72 bovine incisors were cemented and subjected to push-out bond strength testing ( Results: For non-relined fiberglass posts, conventional resin cement exhibited higher push-out bond strength than self-adhesive cement. Relined fiberglass posts yielded comparable results between the resin cements. Type II failure was the most common failure mode for both resin cements, regardless of cementation protocol. The use of relined fiberglass posts improved the cross-sectional microhardness values for both cements. SEM images revealed voids and bubbles in the incisors with non-relined fiberglass posts. Conclusions: Mechanical properties were impacted by the cementation protocol. Relined fiberglass posts presented the highest push-out bond strength and cross-sectional microhardness values, regardless of the resin cement used (conventional dual-cure or self-adhesive). Conversely, for non-relined fiberglass posts, the conventional dual-cure resin cement yielded superior results to the self-adhesive resin cement.

Indexed as

CementationDentinResin cementsRoot canals

Identifiers

PMID38841382
PMCPMC11148402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.