Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Pre-clinical evaluation of clinically relevant iPS cell derived neuroepithelial stem cells as an off-the-shelf cell therapy for spinal cord injury.

Dania Winn, Elias Uhlin, Malin Kele, Ilse Eidhof, Anna Falk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dania WinnDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Elias UhlinDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Malin KeleDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Ilse EidhofDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Anna FalkDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical transplantations using human neuroepithelial stem (NES) cells in spinal cord injury models have exhibited promising results and demonstrated cell integration and functional improvement in transplanted animals. Previous studies have relied on the generation of research grade cell lines in continuous culture. Using fresh cells presents logistic hurdles for clinical transition regarding time and resources for maintaining high quality standards. In this study, we generated a good manufacturing practice (GMP) compliant human iPS cell line in GMP clean rooms alongside a research grade iPS cell line which was produced using standardized protocols with GMP compliant chemicals. These two iPS cell lines were differentiated into human NES cells, from which six batches of cell therapy doses were produced. The doses were cryopreserved, thawed on demand and grafted in a rat spinal cord injury model. Our findings demonstrate that NES cells can be directly grafted post-thaw with high cell viability, maintaining their cell identity and differentiation capacity. This opens the possibility of manufacturing off-the-shelf cell therapy products. Moreover, our manufacturing process yields stable cell doses with minimal batch-to-batch variability, characterized by consistent expression of identity markers as well as similar viability of cells across the two iPS cell lines. These cryopreserved cell doses exhibit sustained viability, functionality, and quality for at least 2 years. Our results provide proof of concept that cryopreserved NES cells present a viable alternative to transplanting freshly cultured cells in future cell therapies and exemplify a platform from which cell formulation can be optimized and facilitate the transition to clinical trials.

Indexed as

cell therapyGMPiPS cellsNES cellsspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38841365
PMCPMC11150580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.