Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841348›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Community perceived barriers to uptake of health services among men at Sedibeng district in South Africa.

Ndumiso Tshuma, Daniel N Elakpa, Clinton Moyo, Tshepo M Ndhlovu, Mathildah M Mokgatle, Sangiwe Moyo, Sehlule Moyo, Martha Chadyiwa, Mandeep K Kochar, Mokgadi Malahlela and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ndumiso TshumaThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-9771
Daniel N ElakpaCenter for Health Policy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-3353
Clinton MoyoThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5704-9766
Tshepo M NdhlovuThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-8289
Mathildah M MokgatleDepartment of Public Health, School of Healthcare Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-8212
Sangiwe MoyoThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-9274
Sehlule MoyoThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9795-5142
Martha ChadyiwaDepartment of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-4402
Mandeep K KocharBombay Teachers' Training College, HSNC University, Colaba, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7896-8363
Mokgadi MalahlelaThe Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5944-8338
Takalani G TshitanganoDepartment of Public Health, University of Venda, Limpopo, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-4242
David D MphuthiDepartment of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-1188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the barriers that hinder men's utilisation of healthcare services in the Sedibeng district of South Africa. Methods: The study was conducted using flyers with questions posted on the Best Health Solutions' Facebook page for two weeks. A convenience sampling method was used and a total of 104 comments were collected from 64 respondents. The authors analysed the participants' self-reported data thematically on demographics, geographic area, and reasons for men not using healthcare services. Results: The findings revealed that sociocultural norms played a significant role in men's reluctance to seek medical help, as it was perceived as a sign of weakness. The scarcity of male healthcare professionals hinders open discussions. Stigma and discrimination were identified as substantial barriers. Convenience, trust, and confidentiality concerns, along with the influence of intimate partners, also influence men's decision-making. Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay between various barriers that impact men's utilisation of healthcare services in the district. By addressing these factors, healthcare providers and policymakers can enhance healthcare access and promote better health outcomes for men in Sedibeng district. Contribution: The manuscript's primary contribution lies in uncovering multifaceted barriers to men's healthcare utilisation in Sedibeng district. It explores socio-cultural norms, healthcare worker demographics, stigma, discrimination, convenience factors, trust, confidentiality concerns, and the influence of intimate partners on men's healthcare choices. These insights illuminate the complex factors affecting men's healthcare access, providing valuable knowledge for healthcare providers and policymakers.

Indexed as

access barriersFacebookhealth-servicesmenSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID38841348
PMCPMC11151431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.