Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841346›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Factors influencing implementation of simulation in nursing and midwifery training in Malawi.

Gertrude Mwalabu, Annie Msosa, Ingrid Tjoflåt, Christina F Risa, Patrick Mapulanga, Bodil Bø, Kristin H Urstad, Masauko Msiska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gertrude MwalabuDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-1863
Annie MsosaDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6024-8008
Ingrid TjoflåtDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-2806
Christina F RisaDepartment of Caring and Ethic, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-1645
Patrick MapulangaLibrary Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-3736
Bodil BøDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-7277
Kristin H UrstadDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8830-4564
Masauko MsiskaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Allied Health Professions, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5719-4493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study explored factors influencing implementation of simulation-based education (SBE) in nursing and midwifery education in Malawi. Aim: This study aimed to identify factors influencing nursing and midwifery educators in selected training institutions and clinical sites. Setting: The study covered one district and four central hospitals, five professional training institutions, Ministry of Health and Nurses and Midwives Council of Malawi officials. Methods: Using mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were gathered from 293 participants, including 149 final-year nursing and midwifery students, and 144 clinical instructors. Qualitative data were obtained from 24 faculty members, 11 clinical instructors and two key informants. Researchers conducted 37 in-depth interviews, 10 focus group discussions and eight desk reviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data, while content analysis was used for qualitative findings. Results: Five themes emerged from qualitative data: absence of simulation in regulatory body syllabi, insufficient formal training, demand for knowledgeable clinical instructors, inadequate human and material resources, and resistance to change. Survey results indicated that 83% of the participants had theoretical SBE knowledge but lacked practical skills, with only 13% considering SBE as a current teaching method. Educators emphasised lack of infrastructure, skills laboratories, teaching hospitals, equipment, and a deficit in formal training as critical barriers to SBE implementation. Conclusion: The study concluded that skilled educators, appropriate infrastructure and resources could facilitate SBE implementation in Malawi. Contribution: Recommendations included regulatory body support, formal training for educators, utilisation of low-fidelity simulators, and establishment of SBE centres and corners in health facilities.

Indexed as

clinical teachingeducationeducatorsMalawimidwiferynursingsimulation

Identifiers

PMID38841346
PMCPMC11151378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.