ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Osteoporosis and coronary heart disease: a bi-directional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Fracture Healing: Mechanisms and Potential Effects on Skeletal Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association between bone health and cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Observational
- Bone and Cardiometabolic Connection: Crosstalk between Osteoporosis and Atherosclerosis.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Review
- Causal relationship between primary biliary cholangitis on osteoporosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2025Article
- The link between osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases: a review of shared mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic approaches.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Review
- Bone mineral density and cardiovascular diseases: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- Threshold effects of bone mineral density on mortality risk: a comprehensive analysis of BMI-mediated pathways in older population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Association between A body shape index and bone mineral density in middle-aged and elderly adults: a retrospective analysis of NHANES 2005-2018.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Non-linear association of the platelet/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with bone mineral density a cross-sectional study.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis (OP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are major global public health issues, especially exacerbated by the challenges of an aging population. As these problems intensify, the associated burden on global health is expected to increase significantly. Despite extensive epidemiological investigations into the potential association between OP and CVD, establishing a clear causal relationship remains elusive. Methods: Instrumental variables were selected from summary statistics of the IEU GWAS database. Five different components of BMD (heel BMD, LS BMD, FA BMD, FN BMD, and TB BMD) were used as OP phenotypes. CHD, MI, and stroke were selected to represent CVD. Multiple analysis methods were used to evaluate the causal relationship between CVD and OP comprehensively. In addition, sensitivity analyses(Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and "leave one out" analysis) were performed to verify the reliability of the results. Results: The MR showed a significant causal relationship between CHD on heel BMD and TB BMD; in the reverse analysis, there was no evidence that OP has a significant causal effect on CVD. The reliability of the results was confirmed through sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: The study results revealed that CHD was causally associated with Heel BMD and TB BMD, while in the reverse MR analysis, the causal relationship between OP and CVD was not supported. This result posits CHD as a potential etiological factor for OP and prompts that routine bone density assessment at traditional sites (forearm, femoral neck, lumbar spine) using DAX may inadequately discern underlying osteoporosis issues in CHD patients. The recommendation is to synergistically incorporate heel ultrasound or DAX for total body bone density examinations, ensuring clinical diagnostics are both precise and reliable. Moreover, these findings provide valuable insights for public health, contributing to the development of pertinent prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.