ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024
Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric dog bite injuries: Infection rates and prescribing practices.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Primary closure and prophylactic antibiotics for treatment of traumatic wounds caused by mammals, a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Characteristics and Management of Pediatric Facial Wounds with Documented Infection or Delayed Presentation: A 25-Year Retrospective Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric dog bite injuries: Infection rates and prescribing practices.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pediatric dog bite injuries are a major public health concern and antibiotic prophylaxis is often prescribed due to concern about the development of infection. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends 3‒5 days of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk dog bites. The purpose of our study was to compare infection rates among patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 3 months to 17 years enrolled in the healthcare systems' affiliated accountable care organization (ACO). Eligible children with a dog bite injury presented at an urgent care center or emergency department between 2016 and 2019. We excluded children who were immunosuppressed or had bites that required closure by a surgeon. An electronic health record review was completed and ACO claims data were used to determine if a prescription was filled. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code concerning for infection within 7 days of injury were recorded as having a bite infection. Results: A total of 2653 non-immunosuppressed children presented for care of dog bite injuries and 672 children met eligibility criteria. Thirty-five children developed an infection of their injury. Of the 539 children who received antibiotic prophylaxis, 5.8% developed an infection and 3.0% of the 133 children who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis developed an infection ( Conclusion: The overall infection rate for pediatric dog bite injuries was 5.2%. In our single-center study, no difference in infection rates was found between those receiving and not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.