Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841290›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2024

Genetic Knock-Ins of Endogenous Fluorescent Tags in RAW 264.7 Murine Macrophages Using CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing.

Beverly Naigles, Jan Soroczynski, Nan Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beverly NaiglesDeparment of Molecular Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jan SoroczynskiLaboratory of Genome Architecture and Dynamics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Nan HaoDeparment of Molecular Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Dynamically compartmentalized control of gene expression by messenger ribonucleoprotein granulesR01GM111458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAO, NAN · 2014 to 2022
$3.4M
Reprogramming cell-fate decisions through predictive modeling and synthetic biologyR01GM144595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAO, NAN, HASTY, JEFF M · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Training Program in Quantitative Integrative BiologyT32GM127235 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HWA, TERENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
Tracking the dynamics of the macrophage response to interferon-gamma at a single-cell levelF31AI161903 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NAIGLES, BEVERLY · 2022 to 2023
$81k
NIAID NIH HHS F31 AI161903NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111458NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144595NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM127235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing is a widely used tool for creating genetic knock-ins, which allow for endogenous tagging of genes. This is in contrast with random insertion using viral vectors, where expression of the inserted transgene changes the total copy number of a gene in a cell and does not reflect the endogenous chromatin environment or any trans-acting regulation experienced at a locus. There are very few protocols for endogenous fluorescent tagging in macrophages. Here, we describe a protocol to design and test CRISPR guide RNAs and donor plasmids, to transfect them into RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage-like cells using the Neon transfection system and to grow up clonal populations of cells containing the endogenous knock-in at various loci. We have used this protocol to create endogenous fluorescent knock-ins in at least six loci, including both endogenously tagging genes and inserting transgenes in the Rosa26 and Tigre safe harbor loci. This protocol uses circular plasmid DNA as the donor template and delivers the sgRNA and Cas9 as an all-in-one expression plasmid. We designed this protocol for fluorescent protein knock-ins; it is best used when positive clones can be identified by fluorescence. However, it may be possible to adapt the protocol for non-fluorescent knock-ins. This protocol allows for the fairly straightforward creation of clonal populations of macrophages with tags at the endogenous loci of genes. We also describe how to set up imaging experiments in 24-well plates to track fluorescence in the edited cells over time. Key features • CRISPR knock-in of fluorescent proteins in RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages at diverse genomic loci. • This protocol is optimized for the use of the Neon transfection system. • Includes instructions for growing up edited clonal populations from single cells with one single-cell sorting step and efficient growth in conditioned media after cell sorting. • Designed for knocking in fluorescent proteins and screening transfected cells by FACS, but modification for non-fluorescent knock-ins may be possible.

Indexed as

CRISPR knock-inEndogenous taggingGenome editingMacrophageRAW 264.7

Identifiers

PMID38841290
PMCPMC10958172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.