ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Outcomes of slow coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in a predominantly African American glaucoma population.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of slow coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (SC-TSCPC) in a primarily African American patient population with glaucoma. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 104 consecutive cases of SC-TSCPC by a single surgeon between November 6, 2019-September 7, 2023. Power ranged from 1150 to 1500 mW, duration was 4 s, and number of spots ranged from 10 to 25. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma, prior CPC, visual acuity (VA) of no light perception or unable to be assessed due to patient's mental status, aphakia, or follow-up <3 months. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6-21 mmHg with a ≥20 % reduction from baseline, no glaucoma re-operation, and no loss of light-perception. Secondary outcome measures included VA, glaucoma medication use, and post-surgical complications. Analysis was also stratified by lens status as literature suggests a greater IOP-lowering effect in pseudophakic eyes after CPC. Results: There were 28 eligible patients (6 phakic, 22 pseudophakic) included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 8.3 months, and 14 patients had postoperative year 1 data available. The mean age was 75.2 ± 13.9 years, 42.9 % were female, and 92.9 % were African American, reflective of the demographics of the local community. The cumulative success rate was 68.5 % at 1 year and did not differ significantly between phakic and pseudophakic patients. Mean VA worsened from 20/600 preoperatively to 20/1050 at last follow-up (P = 0.04) and was marginally worse in the phakic group (P = 0.15). Mean IOP decreased from 31.1 ± 13.2 mmHg on 4.0 ± 1.5 medications preoperatively to 13.8 ± 7.1 mmHg on 2.6 ± 1.5 medications at last follow-up (P < 0.001; P < 0.01), with a more pronounced effect among pseudophakic patients. 85.7 % of patients had prolonged anterior chamber (AC) inflammation beyond 1 month, which persisted in 10.7 % at last follow-up. The cystoid macular edema (CME) rate was 21.4 %, with 10.7 % persistent at last follow-up. Conclusions: SC-TSCPC is an effective, non-incisional IOP-lowering procedure in phakic and pseudophakic eyes that may not otherwise be ideal candidates for incisional glaucoma surgery. Pseudophakic eyes may experience larger reductions in IOP, however, laser settings can be titrated on a case-by-case basis depending on individual patients' goals. There was a higher incidence of prolonged AC inflammation and CME in our cohort compared to similar studies which report rates of 12.7 % and 2.7 %, respectively. Although the significance of such complications may differ based on the visual potential of each patient, these findings support existing literature that African American patients can have greater incidence of inflammation and subsequent sequalae after ocular surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.