Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841149›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2024

Breaking boundaries in neurosurgery through art and technology: A historical perspective.

Nadya Zaragita, Stefano Zhou, Setyo Widi Nugroho, Chandrasekaran Kaliaperumal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadya ZaragitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia.
Stefano ZhouFaculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Setyo Widi NugrohoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia.
Chandrasekaran KaliaperumalDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Since the past, art has been used as a tool to elaborate anatomical knowledge and guide surgeons to perform surgeries. Through the eras, art has taken role by conveying the knowledge to people in forms of illustrations and models, including neuroanatomy knowledge for neurosurgical purposes. With the advancement of technology, neurosurgical trainings and care evolve more than before. Research question: How do art and technology play role in tbe education and development of neurosurgery? Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted to find the role of art and technology in forms of illustrations, models, or others in neurosurgery. Results: Illustration was known as one of the tools to understand it in the past. Now, in the modern era, neurosurgical learning, training, and teaching process have integrated both art and technology throughout the process. Not only as two-dimenional drawings, art and technology have gone as far as being developed into three-dimensional models and create specific models for surgical plannings and simulations. Artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and augmented reality have also been used to achieve accurate and efficient learning process and neurosurgical care. Discussion and conclusion: Art does take significant role in the progression of neurosurgery. When combined with technology, art give greater utility and impact through the learning, teaching process, and delivery of care in neurosurgical world.

Indexed as

3d modelsMedical illustrationNeurosurgery educationNeurosurgery learningSurgical notesSurgical simulations

Identifiers

PMID38841149
PMCPMC11152706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.