ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Two Types of Electrodes for Measuring Submental Muscle Activity During Swallowing.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the potential of a newly developed small electrode to accurately record muscle activity during swallowing. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study included 31 healthy participants. The participants underwent swallowing trials with three types of material. The recordings involved the following conditions: 1) swallowing saliva, 2) swallowing 3 mL water, and 3) swallowing 5 mL water. Two types of electrodes, a conventional electrode (CE) and a newly developed small electrode (NE), were symmetrically positioned on the skin over the suprahyoid muscle group, starting from the center. From the surface electromyography data, the swallowing duration (s), peak amplitude, and rising time (duration from swallowing onset to peak amplitude: s) were measured. Additionally, the equivalence of characteristics of the waveform of muscle activities was calculated by using the variance in both the upper and lower confidence limits in duration and rising time.
resultsNo significant differences in baseline, swallowing duration or rising time between the CE and NE were observed for any swallowing material. The peak amplitude was significantly higher for the NE than for the CE for all swallowing materials. The CE and NE displayed no significant difference in the equivalence of characteristics of the waveform of muscle activities for any swallowing material.
conclusionsThe gold-plated small electrodes utilized in this study indicated the ability to record the same characteristics of muscle activity as conventional electrodes. Moreover, it was able to capture the muscle activity of each muscle group with improved sensitivity in a narrow area, such as under the submandibular region, with more precision than that of conventional electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.