ReviewBiophysics reviews2024
How cytoskeletal crosstalk makes cells move: Bridging cell-free and cell studies.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Displacement to Angle: Diamond-Based 3D Rotation Sensing for High-Precision Cellular Force Measurement.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Co-overexpression of ELOVL2 and ELOVL5 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression through LIMK1-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Translational Fidelity Decline in the Aging Oocyte and Embryo Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dissecting cytoskeletal crosstalk through reconstituted actin-microtubule systems.Molecular biology of the cell · 2026Review
- Venom-Derived Proteins fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Plectin affects cell viscoelasticity at small and large deformations.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Research progress on the interaction mechanisms and functions between exosomes and the cytoskeleton.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- BARCODE: high throughput screening and analysis of soft active materials.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comparison of in vitro migration assays evaluating nintedanib's migration inhibitory effects on melanoma cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025Review
- Unveiling the impact of ERAP1 and ERAP2 on migration, angiogenesis and ER stress response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Viscoelasticity during development: What is it? and why should you care?Seminars in cell & developmental biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell migration is a fundamental process for life and is highly dependent on the dynamical and mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton. Intensive physical and biochemical crosstalk among actin, microtubules, and intermediate filaments ensures their coordination to facilitate and enable migration. In this review, we discuss the different mechanical aspects that govern cell migration and provide, for each mechanical aspect, a novel perspective by juxtaposing two complementary approaches to the biophysical study of cytoskeletal crosstalk: live-cell studies (often referred to as top-down studies) and cell-free studies (often referred to as bottom-up studies). We summarize the main findings from both experimental approaches, and we provide our perspective on bridging the two perspectives to address the open questions of how cytoskeletal crosstalk governs cell migration and makes cells move.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.