ArticleCurrent research in food science2024
Hyperspectral identification of oil adulteration using machine learning techniques.
Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Spectral Evidence Learning from Vis/NIR Imaging for Non-Destructive Authentication of Herbal Medicines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adulteration Detection of Multi-Species Vegetable Oils in Camellia Oil Using SICRIT-HRMS and Machine Learning Methods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-destructive identification of commercial jerky types based on multi-band hyperspectral imaging with machine learning.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Integrating near-infrared hyperspectral imaging with machine learning and feature selection: Detecting adulteration of extra-virgin olive oil with lower-grade olive oils and hazelnut oil.Current research in food science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food adulteration is a global concern, drawing attention from safety authorities due to its potential health risks. Detecting and categorizing oil adulteration is crucial for consumer safety and food industry integrity. This research explores hyperspectral imaging (HSI) analysis to identify substandard oil adulteration at different stages. Using the non-destructive HSI Specim Fx 10 system, a method for precise and easy imaging-based fraud detection and classification was proposed. The 670 oil samples, including pure (Almond, Mustard, Coconut, Olive) and adulterated (Sunflower, Castor, Liquid Paraffin), were analyzed. The Savitzky-Golay filter preprocessed the images to remove noise and smooth spectral signatures. The oils were identified using various machine learning approaches, including Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forests, Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naïve Bayes with Linear Discriminant Analysis excelling in identification. Performance parameters, including precision, recall, F1-score, and overall accuracy, were calculated. The proposed method achieved a validation accuracy of 100%, outperforming numerous state-of-the-art approaches. This study introduces a robust pipeline for effective oil adulteration detection, offering a significant advancement in food safety and quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.