ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024
Composite patch with negative Poisson's ratio mimicking cardiac mechanical properties: Design, experiment and simulation.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mucin-Based Biomimetic Patches for Dynamic Heart Repair: Auxetic Structures and Translational Challenges.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Volumetric 3D Printing and Melt-Electrowriting to Fabricate Implantable Reinforced Cardiac Tissue Patches.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Damage-resistant and body-temperature shape memory skin-mimic elastomer for biomedical applications.Science advances · 2025Article
- Biointegration of soft tissue-inspired hydrogels on the chorioallantoic membrane: An experimental characterization.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing patches that effectively merge intrinsic deformation characteristics of cardiac with superior tunable mechanical properties remains a crucial biomedical pursuit. Currently used traditional block-shaped or mesh patches, typically incorporating a positive Poisson's ratio, often fall short of matching the deformation characteristics of cardiac tissue satisfactorily, thus often diminishing their repairing capability. By introducing auxeticity into the cardiac patches, this study is trying to present a beneficial approach to address these shortcomings of the traditional patches. The patches, featuring the auxetic effect, offer unparalleled conformity to the cardiac complex mechanical challenges. Initially, scaffolds demonstrating the auxetic effect were designed by merging chiral rotation and concave angle units, followed by integrating scaffolds with a composite hydrogel through thermally triggering, ensuring excellent biocompatibility closely mirroring heart tissue. Tensile tests revealed that auxetic patches possessed superior elasticity and strain capacity exceeding cardiac tissue's physiological activity. Notably, Model III showed an equivalent modulus ratio and Poisson's ratio closely toward cardiac tissue, underscoring its outstanding mechanical potential as cardiac patches. Cyclic tensile loading tests demonstrated that Model III withstood continuous heartbeats, showcasing outstanding cyclic loading and recovery capabilities. Numerical simulations further elucidated the deformation and failure mechanisms of these patches, leading to an exploration of influence on mechanical properties with alternative design parameters, which enabled the customization of mechanical strength and Poisson's ratio. Therefore, this research presents substantial potential for designing cardiac auxetic patches that can emulate the deformation properties of cardiac tissue and possess adjustable mechanical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.