ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Graft Position, Healing, and Resorption in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Comparison of 4 Glenoid Augmentation Techniques.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical outcomes and complications in Latarjet versus free bone block procedures for anterior shoulder instability: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Metal-free interconnected knotless anchor fixation for arthroscopic posterior glenoid bone block augmentation with subscapularis transfer in a professional soccer goalkeeper: a case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- A local vascularized scapula bone graft to treat posterior glenohumeral instability-an innovative surgical technique.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Modified Kouvalchouk technique for recurrent posterior instability of the shoulder: A retrospective multicenter review of 31 cases with an average follow-up of 5 years.JSES international · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Allogeneic Bone Strip Grafting for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation With Critical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Free Graft Suspension Fixation Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Global shoulder instability in a seizure patient: anterior and posterior glenoid reconstruction with humeral head reconstruction. A case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Remodelling and the fate of bone grafts in shoulder instability surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Two-year follow-up of arthroscopic bone block technique with iliac crest autograft and remplissage in patients with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss.JSES international · 2025Article
- Metal-Free Arthroscopic Latarjet Surgical Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Up-to-date concepts and procedures in shoulder instability: a comprehensive review.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The success of glenoid augmentation procedures depends on accurate placement and healing of the graft to the glenoid. Different glenoid augmentation techniques have been described, but no comparative studies between them exist. Purpose: To assess the bone graft position, healing, and resorption in a group of patients treated with 1 of 4 procedures: arthroscopic anterior bone-block procedure using either (1) fresh-frozen iliac crest allograft or (2) iliac crest autograft, (3) open Latarjet, or (4) arthroscopic Latarjet. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 40 patients (87.5% men; mean age, 29.5 ± 7.9 years) were included, with 10 patients in each of the procedure groups. The graft position in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Graft healing and resorption were assessed in a second CT scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Qualitative variables were compared between the 4 procedures using the chi-square test, and quantitative variables were compared with the Student Results: No differences were found between the procedures in the axial or sagittal position. The healing rate was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group (20%) compared with the autograft bone-block (80%), open Latarjet (90%), and arthroscopic Latarjet (90%) groups ( Conclusion: Arthroscopic bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provided accurate bone graft positioning. However, very high rates of osteolysis and nonunion were observed in the iliac crest fresh-frozen allograft bone-block procedure when compared with the other procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.