ArticleBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine2024
Granular cell tumor of the brachial nerve in a dog: A case report.
Article in Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we describe the first case of a granular cell tumor (GCT) derived from the brachial nerve. Eleven-year-old neutered female Chihuahua presented to the hospital with a bulge from the left neck to the axilla. The dog had a spherical subcutaneous mass on the cervical subcutis, and cytology hinted at adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor. However, the origin of the tumor remains unknown. During resection of the mass, bleeding was difficult to control owing to the high blood flow, and tumor removal was extremely difficult. The caudal aspect of the mass was attached to the brachial nerve and had to be removed, along with parts of the nerve fibers. The patient's postoperative course was fair, but it developed paralysis of the left thoracic limb. Pathology revealed that the mass was positive for S100 and vimentin, and GCT was diagnosed. Non-oral GCTs are extremely rare. The clinical diagnosis of GCT is difficult and is often confirmed histopathologically by excision. Although most cases of GCT are benign, they must be recognized as hemorrhagic, indistinct masses that mimic malignancy. Excision carries the risk of hemorrhage and damage to the surrounding tissues to secure margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.