ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
A targeted educational intervention increases oral anticoagulation rates in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient perspectives on atrial fibrillation management and pharmacist roles in outpatient clinics: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Adherence to oral thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: an overview for clinicians.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Oral anticoagulant timing and hospitalization in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) management for stroke prevention. Recently, we showed that oral anticoagulation (OAC) rates of AF patients in a large U.S. multispecialty health system are >80%. Objective: The purpose of this study was to improve OAC rates in AF patients via an educational intervention targeted to primary care providers with low OAC rates. Methods: Primary care clinicians were stratified by proportions of their AF patients at elevated stroke risk not taking anticoagulation medication. Clinicians with the lowest rates of anticoagulation were assigned to a target group receiving an educational program consisting of E-mail messaging summarizing anticoagulation guidelines. All other clinicians were assigned to a comparison group (CG). Data from a 6-month lead-in phase were compared with a 6-month follow-up period to determine whether the proportion of AF patients treated with OACs had changed. Results: Of the 141 primary care clinicians with patients who met the inclusion criteria, 36 (25.53%) were assigned to the educational group (EG) and 105 (74.47%) to the CG. At baseline, there was a significant difference in percent of high-risk AF patients who were untreated in the EG (20.65%) compared to the high-risk patients who were untreated in the CG (13.64%; Conclusion: A targeted education program was associated with increased anticoagulation rates for AF patients at high risk for stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.