ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07620015 (Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure), which is not on this map. Cited by 212 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
212 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review of instruments for measuring sex and gender attributes: assessment of measurement properties and utility in research on clinical and functional outcomes.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Psychometric Properties of Eating Behaviour Instruments for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Pooled it
- Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Effects and User-Reported Experiences of a Self-Management Mobile Health App for Grieving Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Evaluating the Role of School-Based Weekly Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation in Shaping Common Morbidity and Growth Outcomes Among Adolescent Girls: Evidence From a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Central Ethiopia Region.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Building character strengths and virtues in Sri Lanka: a cluster randomized pre-post evaluation of a school-based intervention.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- Nurse-led telemedicine versus in-person lactation support for breastfeeding initiation in mothers of low-birth-weight infants: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and initial psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian PSPSQ 2.0 in community pharmacies and public primary healthcare centres.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Factors influencing quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- The Dutch-translated Climate and Health Tool for nurses: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Linking Career Calling Profiles to Ecological Considerations in Vocational Behaviors, Ecological Worries and Nature Connectedness.Journal of career assessment · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of the Turkish version of the ANDROTEST for detecting male hypogonadism in patients with sexual dysfunction.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 for Responses to Adverse Workplace Performance Evaluation Among Greek Public Healthcare Employees.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Preventive Behavior Questionnaire for Older Workers in Brazil: Protocol for a Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Feasibility of AI-Enabled Chatbots for Pre-consultation in HIV Care in Northern Nigeria.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Questionnaire in Swedish Prehospital Care: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Pilot Psychometric Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (EASi-QoL) questionnaire: translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation for use in Iraqi ankylosing spondylitis patients.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
152 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.