ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Distinguishing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from Hodgkin's lymphoma in children using an enhanced computed tomography radiomics approach.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) are two completely different pathologic subtypes of lymphoma with distinctly different clinical presentations and treatment options. Thus, accurately differentiating between the two subtypes has important clinical implications. This study aimed to construct a radiomics model capable of distinguishing between DLBCL and HL based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) for the non-invasive diagnosis of lymphoma subtypes. Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 16 patients confirmed to have DLBCL (33 lymphomas), and 50 patients confirmed to have HL (106 lymphomas) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were completely randomized into a training set (n=107, DLBLC׃HL ratio: 23׃84) and a test set (n=32, DLBCL׃HL ratio: 10׃22). After multiple down-sampling, 2,264 radiomics features were automatically extracted by the application software. Feature selection was performed in the training set using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, maximum correlation minimum redundancy, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm in that order. The features after selection were used to build radiomics models by logistic regression (LR) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). We evaluated the model ability using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the DeLong test. Moreover, clinical indicators, such as gender, age, clinical stage, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), were collected and analyzed by univariate and multivariate LR analyses. The radiomics characteristics with clinical indicators that had independent influences on predicting the pathological subtypes were used to establish a comprehensive classification model. Results: The analysis of the clinical data revealed that LDH can serve as a clinical indicator that has an independent influence on the prediction of HL and DLBCL. The results of the radiomics models were as follows: Radiomics_LR: area under the curve (AUC) =0.814 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.628-0.999]; and Radiomics_QDA: AUC =0.841 (95% CI: 0.691-0.991). Following the inclusion of LDH as a clinical indicator in the analysis, the results of the comprehensive models were as follows: Radiomics + LDH_LR: AUC =0.768 (95% CI: 0.580-0.956); and Radiomics + LDH_QDA: AUC was 0.845 (95% CI: 0.695-0.996). Conclusions: The models based on radiomics and clinical features were able to effectively distinguish DLBCL from HL. The model with the best overall performance was the Radiomics_LR model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.