ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Advancing necrotizing enterocolitis prediction through iterative monitoring.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and Staging of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Current Controversies and a Phenotype-Based Framework.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Observational
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of gasdermin D as a biomarker for necrotizing enterocolitis: a single-center diagnostic test study.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe inflammatory intestinal disease in preterm infants, marked by heightened morbidity and mortality. Timely prediction of NEC is significant in the management of critical neonates. However, it is difficult to predict NEC accurately because of the multi-factorial pathogenesis. This study aimed to develop a prediction model through repeated measurement data to further improve the accuracy of prediction in NEC. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data of premature infants admitted to the Neonatology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to December 2023. The infants were categorized into the NEC group (Bell's stage ≥ II) (n=150) and the non-NEC group (n=150). The clinical baseline data of the NEC and non-NEC groups were matched. Laboratory examination indicators were collected on the 1st day, the 7th day after birth, and the day of NEC onset. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors influencing NEC. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors to predict NEC. The concordance index and calibration plot were used to assess the efficiency of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts. Results: This study demonstrated that antenatal steroids, antenatal antibiotics, probiotics treatment before NEC, anion gap (AG, day 7), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV, day 7) were independent risk factors which combined to accurately predict NEC. A nomogram of NEC was created utilizing these five predictors. With an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.835 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.785-0.884]. Concordance index for the training and validation groups were 0.835 and 0.848, respectively. As the calibration plots indicate, the predicted probability of NEC is highly consistent with the actual observation. Conclusions: The risk estimation nomogram for NEC offers clinical value by guiding early prediction, targeted prevention, and early intervention strategies for NEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.