ReviewSurgical neurology international2024
Evaluating intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) resection surgery: A systematic review.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery is the best approach to treating focal cortical dysplasia (FCD)-related epilepsy; yet, it has suboptimal outcomes because distinguishing the boundaries between the FCD region and normal brain tissue intraoperatively poses a challenge. The use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) helps demarcate FCD lesion borders leading to more accurate intraoperative resection. In this review, the use of IOUS for the resection of FCD was evaluated. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus Library, and Dynamed Library databases were searched, and two independent reviewers examined the articles. The search terms related to "drug-resistant epilepsy" and "intraoperative ultrasound." The results between January 2008 and April 2022 were abridged for FCD type, ultrasound resolution, extent of lesion resection, correction of brain shift, postoperative neurological deficits, and postoperative seizure freedom (Engel classification). Results: Ten articles were included in the study. The parameters used to assess the efficacy of IOUS in FCD surgery were ultrasound resolution, demarcation of lesion boundaries, correction of brain shift, postoperative neurological deficits, and seizure freedom. Most studies have shown that IOUS produces high-resolution images. Surgery for Type 2 FCD patients had better outcomes than surgery for Type 1 FCD patients due to better visualization by IOUS. Patients were classified as Engel class 1 or class 2 postoperatively. Eight studies found that IOUS was superior to magnetic resonance imaging in brain shift correction. Conclusion: The preliminary results look promising, especially for the international league against epilepsy class 2 FCD. However, there is a need for more high-quality research evaluating the use of IOUS in FCD and comparing it to other intraoperative imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.