Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840576›Full record

Observational studyEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Long-term cardiac computed tomography follow-up after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Lasse Hubertus Tiroke, Anders Kramer, Mette Wørmer Poulsen, Caroline Damsgaard Jensen, Jesper Møller Jensen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Kasper Korsholm, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Left atrial appendage occlusion: can CCT see the leaks?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lasse Hubertus TirokeDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders KramerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette Wørmer PoulsenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Caroline Damsgaard JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper Møller JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bjarne Linde NørgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kasper KorsholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Erik Nielsen-KudskDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is performed increasingly, but long-term follow-up imaging data are lacking.

aimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and durability of the Amplatzer Amulet device >4 years after LAAO.

methodsThis was a prospective observational cohort study including 52 patients implanted with the Amplatzer Amulet device at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. A >4-year follow-up cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan after LAAO was performed and compared with the results from the 2-month and 12-month scans. The primary outcome was left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing based on distal LAA contrast patency and peridevice leakage (PDL), stratified into complete occlusion (grade 0 [G0]) and grade 1-3 leakage (G1-3), respectively. Secondary outcomes were low- and high-grade hypoattenuated thickening (HAT), device-related thrombosis (DRT) and device durability.

resultsThe median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time from LAAO to the latest CT scan was 5.8 years (4.5; 6.3). At 2-month (n=52), 12-month (n=27) and >4-year CT follow-ups (n=52), rates of both complete occlusion (33%, 37%, 35%) and G2 leaks (52%, 52%, 48%) remained stable. Rates of G1 leaks varied (14%, 4%, 6%) and G3 leaks rose (2%, 7%, 12%) from earliest to latest follow-up. The median left atrial (LA) volume increased from 127 mL (96; 176) to 144 mL (108; 182) and 147 mL (107; 193). No DRT was found. The structural device integrity was preserved.

conclusionsThis study indicates a stable LAA sealing status throughout the follow-up period, emphasising the importance of the procedural result in avoiding PDL. Few patients displayed PDL progression, which might partly be related to LA remodelling with increasing volume. The long-term device durability appears excellent. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationSeptal Occluder DeviceTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38840576
PMCPMC11145311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.