Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840477›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2025

Gender inclusivity of ophthalmology journal submission guidelines and associated research metrics.

Brendan K Tao, Jim S Xie, Rachel Leong, Matton Xia, Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen, Jennifer Ling, Nawaaz Nathoo, Edsel B Ing, Radha P Kohly, Faisal Khosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brendan K TaoFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7069-3162
Jim S XieMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Rachel LeongFaculty of Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-3905-915X
Matton XiaFaculty of Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anne Xuan-Lan NguyenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-946X
Jennifer LingDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nawaaz NathooDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Edsel B IngDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Radha P KohlyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Faisal KhosaVancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis cross-sectional study evaluated the prevalence of inclusive author submission guidelines across ophthalmology journals.

methodsJournals were identified from the 2021 Journal Citations Report (Clarivate Analytics). Independent reviewers rated each author submission guideline as "inclusive" for satisfying at-least one of six criteria: i) included examples of gender inclusive language; ii) recommended the use of gender-inclusive language; iii) distinguished between sex and gender; iv) provided educational resources on gender-inclusive language; v) provided a policy permitting name changes (e.g., in case of gender and name transition); and/or vi) provided a statement of commitment to inclusivity. The primary objective was to investigate the proportion of journals with "gender-inclusive" author submission guidelines and the elements of the gender-inclusive content within these guidelines. A secondary objective was to review the association between "gender-inclusivity" in author submission guidelines with publisher, origin country, and journal/source/influence metrics (Clarivate Analytics).

resultsAcross 94 journals, 29.8% journals were rated as inclusive. Inclusive journals had significantly higher relative impact factor, citations, and article influence scores compared to non-inclusive journals. Of the 29.8% of inclusive journals, the three most common domains were inclusion of an inclusivity statement (71.4% of inclusive journals), distinguishing between sex and gender (67.9%), and provision of additional educational resources on gender reporting for authors (60.7%).

conclusionA minority of ophthalmology journals have gender-inclusive author submission guidelines. Ophthalmology journals should update their submission guidelines to advance gender equity of both authors and study participants and promote the inclusion of gender-diverse communities.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyPeriodicals as TopicAuthorshipBibliometricsBiomedical ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesEditorial PoliciesFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansJournal Impact FactorMaleAuthor submission guidelinesgenderinclusionophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID38840477
PMCPMC11697490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.