Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840240›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Spatial and geometric learning for classification of breast tumors from multi-center ultrasound images: a hybrid learning approach.

Jintao Ru, Zili Zhu, Jialin Shi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jintao RuDepartment of Medical Engineering, Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China. rujingtao@outlook.com.
Zili ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Jialin ShiRehabilitation Medicine Institute, Zhejiang Rehabilitation Medical Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and ultrasound is a usual tool for early screening. Nowadays, deep learning technique is applied as an auxiliary tool to provide the predictive results for doctors to decide whether to make further examinations or treatments. This study aimed to develop a hybrid learning approach for breast ultrasound classification by extracting more potential features from local and multi-center ultrasound data.

methodsWe proposed a hybrid learning approach to classify the breast tumors into benign and malignant. Three multi-center datasets (BUSI, BUS, OASBUD) were used to pretrain a model by federated learning, then every dataset was fine-tuned at local. The proposed model consisted of a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a graph neural network (GNN), aiming to extract features from images at a spatial level and from graphs at a geometric level. The input images are small-sized and free from pixel-level labels, and the input graphs are generated automatically in an unsupervised manner, which saves the costs of labor and memory space.

resultsThe classification AUC

conclusionsOur hybrid approach can learn the inter-feature among multi-center data and the intra-feature of local data. It shows potential in aiding doctors for breast tumor classification in ultrasound at an early stage.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonography, MammaryAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedArtificial intelligenceBreast tumor classificationConvolutional neural networkFederated learningGraph neural networkUltrasound images

Identifiers

PMID38840240
PMCPMC11155188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.