Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840239›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Epigenetic differences between wild and cultivated grapevines highlight the contribution of DNA methylation during crop domestication.

Alberto Rodriguez-Izquierdo, David Carrasco, Lakshay Anand, Roberta Magnani, Pablo Catarecha, Rosa Arroyo-Garcia, Carlos M Rodriguez Lopez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alberto Rodriguez-IzquierdoCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP-INIA), CSIC - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Montegancedo, Madrid, Spain.
David CarrascoCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP-INIA), CSIC - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Montegancedo, Madrid, Spain.
Lakshay AnandEnvironmental Epigenetics and Genetics Group (EEGG), Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Food and environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Roberta MagnaniEnvironmental Epigenetics and Genetics Group (EEGG), Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Food and environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Pablo CatarechaCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP-INIA), CSIC - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Montegancedo, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa Arroyo-Garcia *Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP-INIA), CSIC - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Montegancedo, Madrid, Spain. rarroyo@inia.csic.es.
Carlos M Rodriguez Lopez *Environmental Epigenetics and Genetics Group (EEGG), Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Food and environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. carlos.rodriguezlopez@uky.edu.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST Action CA 17111Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RTI2018-094470-R-C21National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1018617National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1020852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication process in grapevines has facilitated the fixation of desired traits. Nowadays, vegetative propagation through cuttings enables easier preservation of these genotypes compared to sexual reproduction. Nonetheless, even with vegetative propagation, various phenotypes are often present within the same vineyard due to the accumulation of somatic mutations. These mutations are not the sole factors influencing phenotype. Alongside somatic variations, epigenetic variation has been proposed as a pivotal player in regulating phenotypic variability acquired during domestication. The emergence of these epialleles might have significantly influenced grapevine domestication over time. This study aims to investigate the impact of domestication on methylation patterns in cultivated grapevines. Reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing was conducted on 18 cultivated and wild accessions. Results revealed that cultivated grapevines exhibited higher methylation levels than their wild counterparts. Differential Methylation Analysis between wild and cultivated grapevines identified a total of 9955 differentially methylated cytosines, of which 78% were hypermethylated in cultivated grapevines. Functional analysis shows that core methylated genes (consistently methylated in both wild and cultivated accessions) are associated with stress response and terpenoid/isoprenoid metabolic processes. Meanwhile, genes with differential methylation are linked to protein targeting to the peroxisome, ethylene regulation, histone modifications, and defense response. Collectively, our results highlight the significant roles that epialleles may have played throughout the domestication history of grapevines.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDNA MethylationDomesticationEpigenesis, GeneticVitisPhenotypeCultivatedDomesticationEpiGBSEpigenetic memoryEpigenomicsGrapevineMethylationWild

Identifiers

PMID38840239
PMCPMC11155169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.