Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840138›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Effect of margin designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a finite element analysis.

Baijin Zeng, Bin Luo, Jiangqi Hu, Dan Meng, Jiebing Zhang, Xu Cao, Qingsong Jiang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Baijin Zeng *Department of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Bin Luo *Department of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Jiangqi HuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Dan MengDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Jiebing ZhangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xu CaoDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. dentistcao@mail.ccmu.edu.cn.
Qingsong JiangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, No. 4 Tiantanxili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. qsjiang@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Capital' s Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2022-1-2141Young Scientist Program of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University YSP202207Young Scientist Program of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University YSP202316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMargin designs and loading conditions can impact the mechanical characteristics and survival of endocrowns. Analyzing the stress distribution of endocrowns with various margin designs and loading conditions can provide evidence for their clinical application.

methodsThree finite element analysis models were established based on the margin designs: endocrown with a butt-joint type margin (E0), endocrown with a 90° shoulder (E90), and endocrown with a 135° shoulder (E135). The E0 group involved lowering the occlusal surface and preparing the pulp chamber. The E90 group created a 90° shoulder on the margin of model E0, measuring 1.5 mm high and 1 mm wide. The E135 group featured a 135° shoulder. The solids of the models were in fixed contact with each other, and the materials of tooth tissue and restoration were uniform, continuous, isotropic linear elasticity. Nine static loads were applied, with a total load of 225 N, and the maximum von Mises stresses and stress distribution were calculated for teeth and endocrowns with different margin designs.

resultsCompared the stresses of different models under the same loading condition. In endocrowns, when the loading points were concentrated on the buccal side, the maximum von Mises stresses were E0 = E90 = E135, and when there was a lingual loading, they were E0 < E90 = E135. In enamel, the maximum von Mises stresses under all loading conditions were E0 > E90 > E135. In dentin, the maximum von Mises stresses of the three models were basically similar except for load2, load5 and load9. Compare the stresses of the same model under different loading conditions. In endocrowns, stresses were higher when lingual loading was present. In enamel and dentin, stresses were higher when loaded obliquely or unevenly. The stresses in the endocrowns were concentrated in the loading area. In enamel, stress concentration occurred at the cementoenamel junction. In particular, E90 and E135 also experienced stress concentration at the shoulder. In dentin, the stresses were mainly concentrated in the upper section of the tooth root.

conclusionStress distribution is similar among the three margin designs of endocrowns, but the shoulder-type designs, especially the 135° shoulder, exhibit reduced stress concentration.

Indexed as

Dental Stress AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisStress, MechanicalBiomechanical PhenomenaCrownsDental Prosthesis DesignDentinHumansEndocrownFinite element analysisLoading conditionMargin designThe maximum von Mises stress

Identifiers

PMID38840138
PMCPMC11151608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.