ArticleBMC cancer2024
Predicting treatment response in multicenter non-small cell lung cancer patients based on federated learning.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Privacy-preserving multicenter validation of the RMODscore".Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Towards an ecosystem of clinical decision support tools for precision cancer medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer: the current state of the science on multi-omic applications.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Radiofrequency Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia in the V2 Maxillary Nerve.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Comparative study on predicting postoperative distant metastasis of lung cancer based on machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning in prognostic prediction of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- A generalized heterogeneous federated model for identifying patients with postoperative progression of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ST6GALNAC1 mediates sialylation of mucins in non-small cell lung cancer to evade immune surveillance.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Navigating real-world challenges: A case study on federated learning in computational pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Linear Federated Learning for Outcome Prediction With Application to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Radiotherapy.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Machine learning in image-based outcome prediction after radiotherapy: A review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Review
- Real-world federated learning in radiology: hurdles to overcome and benefits to gain.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulticenter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient data is information-rich. However, its direct integration becomes exceptionally challenging due to constraints involving different healthcare organizations and regulations. Traditional centralized machine learning methods require centralizing these sensitive medical data for training, posing risks of patient privacy leakage and data security issues. In this context, federated learning (FL) has attracted much attention as a distributed machine learning framework. It effectively addresses this contradiction by preserving data locally, conducting local model training, and aggregating model parameters. This approach enables the utilization of multicenter data with maximum benefit while ensuring privacy safeguards. Based on pre-radiotherapy planning target volume images of NSCLC patients, a multicenter treatment response prediction model is designed by FL for predicting the probability of remission of NSCLC patients. This approach ensures medical data privacy, high prediction accuracy and computing efficiency, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
methodsWe retrospectively collected CT images from 245 NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) in four Chinese hospitals. In a simulation environment, we compared the performance of the centralized deep learning (DL) model with that of the FL model using data from two sites. Additionally, due to the unavailability of data from one hospital, we established a real-world FL model using data from three sites. Assessments were conducted using measures such as accuracy, receiver operating characteristic curve, and confusion matrices.
resultsThe model's prediction performance obtained using FL methods outperforms that of traditional centralized learning methods. In the comparative experiment, the DL model achieves an AUC of 0.718/0.695, while the FL model demonstrates an AUC of 0.725/0.689, with real-world FL model achieving an AUC of 0.698/0.672.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that the performance of a FL predictive model, developed by combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with data from multiple medical centers, is comparable to that of a traditional DL model obtained through centralized training. It can efficiently predict CRT treatment response in NSCLC patients while preserving privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.