Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38840081›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Predicting treatment response in multicenter non-small cell lung cancer patients based on federated learning.

Yuan Liu, Jinzao Huang, Jyh-Cheng Chen, Wei Chen, Yuteng Pan, Jianfeng Qiu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comment on "Privacy-preserving multicenter validation of the RMODscore".Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Real-world federated learning in radiology: hurdles to overcome and benefits to gain.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan LiuSchool of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Jinzao HuangDepartment of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, China.
Jyh-Cheng ChenDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming Chiao- Tung University, Taipei, China.
Wei ChenSchool of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Yuteng PanSchool of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Jianfeng QiuSchool of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China. jfqiu100@gmail.com.

Funding

China National Key Research and Development No. 2021YFE0204600the Academic Promotion Program of Shandong First Medical University No. 2019QL009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulticenter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient data is information-rich. However, its direct integration becomes exceptionally challenging due to constraints involving different healthcare organizations and regulations. Traditional centralized machine learning methods require centralizing these sensitive medical data for training, posing risks of patient privacy leakage and data security issues. In this context, federated learning (FL) has attracted much attention as a distributed machine learning framework. It effectively addresses this contradiction by preserving data locally, conducting local model training, and aggregating model parameters. This approach enables the utilization of multicenter data with maximum benefit while ensuring privacy safeguards. Based on pre-radiotherapy planning target volume images of NSCLC patients, a multicenter treatment response prediction model is designed by FL for predicting the probability of remission of NSCLC patients. This approach ensures medical data privacy, high prediction accuracy and computing efficiency, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

methodsWe retrospectively collected CT images from 245 NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) in four Chinese hospitals. In a simulation environment, we compared the performance of the centralized deep learning (DL) model with that of the FL model using data from two sites. Additionally, due to the unavailability of data from one hospital, we established a real-world FL model using data from three sites. Assessments were conducted using measures such as accuracy, receiver operating characteristic curve, and confusion matrices.

resultsThe model's prediction performance obtained using FL methods outperforms that of traditional centralized learning methods. In the comparative experiment, the DL model achieves an AUC of 0.718/0.695, while the FL model demonstrates an AUC of 0.725/0.689, with real-world FL model achieving an AUC of 0.698/0.672.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the performance of a FL predictive model, developed by combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with data from multiple medical centers, is comparable to that of a traditional DL model obtained through centralized training. It can efficiently predict CRT treatment response in NSCLC patients while preserving privacy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedChemoradiotherapyDeep LearningFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeChemotherapy and radiotherapyFederated learningNon-small cell lung cancerTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID38840081
PMCPMC11155008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.