ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Evaluation of left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy in patients with acute myocardial infarction by 4D Flow MRI: a preliminary study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy by 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Left ventricular flow dynamics by cardiac imaging techniques in heart failure patients: state of the art.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the intracavity left ventricular (LV) blood flow kinetic energy (KE) parameters using four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
methodsThirty AMI patients and twenty controls were examined via CMR, which included cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and global heart 4D flow imaging. The KE parameters were indexed to LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) to obtain average, systolic and diastolic KE as well as the proportion of LV in-plane KE (%). These parameters were compared between the AMI patients and controls and between the two subgroups.
resultsAnalysis of the LV blood flow KE parameters at different levels of the LV cavity and in different segments of the same level showed that the basal level had the highest blood flow KE while the apical level had the lowest in the control group. There were no significant differences in diastolic KE, systolic in-plane KE and diastolic in-plane KE between the anterior wall and posterior wall (p > 0.05), only the systolic KE had a significant difference between them (p < 0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the average (10.7 ± 3.3 µJ/mL vs. 14.7 ± 3.6 µJ/mL, p < 0.001), systolic (14.6 ± 5.1 µJ/mL vs. 18.9 ± 3.9 µJ/mL, p = 0.003) and diastolic KE (7.9 ± 2.5 µJ/mL vs. 10.6 ± 3.8 µJ/mL, p = 0.018) were significantly lower in the AMI group. The average KE in the infarct segment was lower than that in the noninfarct segment in the AMI group (49.5 ± 18.7 µJ/mL vs. 126.3 ± 50.7 µJ/mL, p < 0.001), while the proportion of systolic in-plane KE increased significantly (61.8%±11.5 vs. 42.9%±14.4, p = 0.001).
conclusionThe 4D Flow MRI technique can be used to quantitatively evaluate LV regional hemodynamic parameters. There were differences in the KE parameters of LV blood flow at different levels and in different segments of the same level in healthy people. In AMI patients, the average KE of the infarct segment decreased, while the proportion of systolic in-plane KE significantly increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.