ArticleNature2024
Post-January 6th deplatforming reduced the reach of misinformation on Twitter.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-January 6 deplatforming shows long-term effects on ideological polarization among Twitter users.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Explaining Twitter's inability to effectively moderate content during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Audits of the 2020 American election show an accurate vote count.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Emergent structures of attention on social media are driven by amplification and triad transitivity.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Large-scale analysis of fact-checked stories on Twitter reveals graded effects of ambiguity and falsehood on information reappearance.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The social media platforms of the twenty-first century have an enormous role in regulating speech in the USA and worldwide
Indexed as
Identifiers
38840016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.