Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Molecular insights and antibody response to Dr20/22 in dogs naturally infected with Dirofilaria repens.

Mateusz Pękacz, Katarzyna Basałaj, Daniel Młocicki, Maciej Kamaszewski, Elena Carretón, Rodrigo Morchón, Marcin Wiśniewski, Anna Zawistowska-Deniziak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mateusz PękaczDivision of Parasitology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-786, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna BasałajMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-818, Warsaw, Poland.
Daniel MłocickiDepartment of General Biology and Parasitology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej KamaszewskiDepartment of Ichthyology and Biotechnology in Aquaculture, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-786, Warsaw, Poland.
Elena CarretónInternal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Arucas, Arucas, 35413, Las Palmas, Spain.
Rodrigo MorchónZoonotic Diseases and One Health Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Marcin Wiśniewski *Division of Parasitology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-786, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Zawistowska-Deniziak *Department of Immunology, Institute of Functional Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 02-095, Warsaw, Poland. a.zawistowska-deniziak@uw.edu.pl.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju 0106/L-9/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcutaneous dirofilariasis, caused by the parasitic nematode Dirofilaria repens, is a growing concern in Europe, affecting both dogs and humans. This study focused on D. repens Dr20/22, a protein encoded by an alt (abundant larval transcript) gene family. While well-documented in L3 larvae of other filariae species, this gene family had not been explored in dirofilariasis. The research involved cloning Dr20/22 cDNA, molecular characterization, and evaluating its potential application in the diagnosis of dirofilariasis. Although Real-Time analysis revealed mRNA expression in both adult worms and microfilariae, the native protein remained undetected in lysates from both developmental stages. This suggests the protein's specificity for L3 larvae and may be related to a process called SLTS (spliced leader trans-splicing), contributing to stage-specific gene expression. The specificity of the antigen for invasive larvae positions it as a promising early marker for dirofilariasis. However, ELISA tests using sera from infected and uninfected dogs indicated limited diagnostic utility. While further research is required, our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the molecular and immunological aspects of host-parasite interactions and could offer insights into the parasite's strategies for evading the immune system.

Indexed as

Dirofilaria repensDirofilariasisDog DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntibody FormationAntigens, HelminthDogsHelminth ProteinsLarvaAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38839868
PMCPMC11153217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.