ArticleScientific reports2024
Electrical lymph node scanning (ELS) system for real-time intra-operative detection of involved axillary lymph nodes in adjuvant breast cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymph node (LN) status is an essential prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients, with an important role in the surgical and therapeutic plan. Recently, we have been developed a novel system for real-time intra-operative electrical LN scanning in BC patients. The ELS scores were calibrated by pathological evaluation of the LNs. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of ELS in a prospective study for non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. This is a prospective study in which ELS scores are blind for pathologists who declare the clearance or involvement of LNs based on permanent pathology as the gold standard. ELS and frozen-section (FS) pathology results were achieved intra-operatively, and samples were sent for the permanent pathology. The score of ELS did not affect the surgeons' decision, and the treatment approach was carried out based on FS pathology and pre-surgical data, such as imaging and probable biopsies. Patients were recruited from October 2021 through November 2022, and 381 lymph nodes of 97 patients were included in the study. In this study we recruited 38 patients (39.2%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 59 patients (60.8%) with ALND. Of the 381 LNs scored by ELS, 329 sentinel LNs underwent routine pathology, while others (n = 52) underwent both FS and permanent pathology. ELS showed a sensitivity of 91.4% for node-positive patients, decreasing to 84.8% when considering all LNs. Using ROC analysis, ELS diagnosis showed a significant AUC of 0.878 in relation to the permanent pathology gold standard. Comparison of ELS diagnosis for different tumor types and LN sizes demonstrated no significant differences, while increasing LN size correlated with enhanced ELS sensitivity. This study confirmed ELS's efficacy in real-time lymph node detection among non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. The use of ELS's pathological scoring for intra-operative LN diagnosis, especially in the absence of FS pathology or for non-sentinel LN involvement, could improve prognosis and reduce complications by minimizing unnecessary dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.