Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839697›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Too many embryos: a critical perspective on a global challenge.

Alessandro Bartolacci, Carolina Dolci, Luca Pagliardini, Enrico Papaleo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro BartolacciObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy. bartolacci.alessandr@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-5513
Carolina DolciObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Luca PagliardiniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Enrico PapaleoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, significant endeavors have been directed toward establishing an optimal oocyte number to maximize the chances for successful in vitro fertilization outcomes. The effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies has greatly improved, and more good-quality embryos are being created in each cycle. However, many of these embryos remain unused. Notably, in Europe, approximately one-third of couples did not use their surplus cryopreserved embryos. Surplus embryos pose a challenge for patients and clinics. Embryo disposal practices are not the same all over the continent, with embryo donation and embryo discharge not allowed in several countries. In this scenario, limiting the number of surplus embryos by reducing the number of inseminated oocytes, according to couple clinical history, could be a strategy.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo TransferFertilization in VitroReproductive Techniques, AssistedEmbryo DispositionEmbryo, MammalianFemaleHumansOocytesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38839697
PMCPMC11263306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.