ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Deep Learning Models of Multi-Scale Lesion Perception Attention Networks for Diagnosis and Staging of Pneumoconiosis: A Comparative Study with Radiologists.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of pneumoconiosis is essential for individualized early prevention and treatment. However, the different manifestations and high heterogeneity among radiologists make it difficult to diagnose and stage pneumoconiosis accurately. Here, based on DR images collected from two centers, a novel deep learning model, namely Multi-scale Lesion-aware Attention Networks (MLANet), is proposed for diagnosis of pneumoconiosis, staging of pneumoconiosis, and screening of stage I pneumoconiosis. A series of indicators including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score were used to comprehensively evaluate the performance of the model. The results show that the MLANet model can effectively improve the consistency and efficiency of pneumoconiosis diagnosis. The accuracy of the MLANet model for pneumoconiosis diagnosis on the internal test set, external validation set, and prospective test set reached 97.87%, 98.03%, and 95.40%, respectively, which was close to the level of qualified radiologists. Moreover, the model can effectively screen stage I pneumoconiosis with an accuracy of 97.16%, a recall of 98.25, a precision of 93.42%, and an F1 score of 95.59%, respectively. The built model performs better than the other four classification models. It is expected to be applied in clinical work to realize the automated diagnosis of pneumoconiosis digital chest radiographs, which is of great significance for individualized early prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.