ArticleSurgery today2024
Right-sided versus left-sided colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a sub-analysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan.
Article in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel scoring system for the preoperative computed tomographic diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Prior cholecystectomy may identify a biologically aggressive subset of RAS-mutated proximal colon cancer: A 13-year retrospective cohort study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Differential Prognostic Impact of Prior Cholecystectomy Between Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer: A 12-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 3487 Consecutive Patients.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of the cancer-inflammation prognostic index for identifying high-risk stage II colorectal cancer.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Age and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis Between Patients Younger and Older than 70 Years.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: A multicenter real-world data study.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the impact of sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients on the prognosis.
methodsIn a sub-analysis of a multicenter case-control study of CRC patients who underwent surgery at ≥ 80 years old conducted in Japan between 2003 and 2007, both short- and long-term outcomes were compared between right-sided colon cancers (RCCs) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCCs). RCCs were defined as those located from the cecum to the transverse colon.
resultsAmong the 1680 patients who underwent curative surgery, 812 and 868 had RCCs and LCCs, respectively. RCCs were more frequent than LCCs in those who were female, had renal comorbidities, and had a history of abdominal surgery. Regarding tumor characteristics, RCCs were larger, invaded more deeply, and were diagnosed as either mucinous or signet ring-cell carcinoma more frequently than LCCs. Regarding the prognosis, patients with RCCs had a significantly longer cancer-specific survival (CS-S) and cancer-specific relapse-free survival (CS-RFS) than those with LCCs. Furthermore, sidedness was determined to be an independent prognostic factor for CS-S and CS-RFS.
conclusionRCCs, which accounted for half of the cases in patients ≥ 80 years old, showed better long-term outcomes than LCCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.