ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024
Preventing Post-incisional Dural Shrink in Craniotomy: Introducing the "Roll-up Technique".
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dural dryness makes suturing difficult during dural closure after craniotomy. In this case, dural plasty is often performed using a membrane taken from the surrounding tissue (e.g., fascia or periosteum) or an artificial replacement membrane. Herein, we introduce our novel "roll-up technique" to reduce the utilization of substitute membranes and explore its effectiveness in dural closure. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 50 patients who underwent craniotomy for the first time for supratentorial intracranial lesions between 2015 and 2022. Furthermore, we divided them into two groups: (1) the conventional technique group, which consisted of patients in whom the dura mater was flipped after incision and protected with a moistened gauze (n = 23), and (2) the roll-up technique group, which consisted of patients in whom the dura mater was incised in a U shape, rolled up, and protected with a moist gauze (n = 27). After surgery, we compared the success rates of primary closure, operating time, craniotomy area, and percentage of complications (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leakage or infection) between the groups. Dural closure without dural substitutes using the roll-up technique had a higher success rate than that using the conventional technique (26/27 [96.3%] cases vs. 14/23 [60.9%] cases; P = 0.003). Postoperative CSF leakage or infection did not occur, and no statistically significant difference was observed in the operating time between the groups (P = 0.247). The roll-up technique for dural closure may effectively prevent post-incisional dural shrink after craniotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.