Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839194›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2024

Waist-to-height ratio and body fat percentage as risk factors for ischemic cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study from UK Biobank.

Qi Feng, Jelena Bešević, Megan Conroy, Wemimo Omiyale, Mark Woodward, Ben Lacey, Naomi Allen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Revisiting Obesity Definitions: Impact of the 2025 Lancet Commission Criteria on Obesity Prevalence Among People With MASLD.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi FengNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: qifeng@cuhk.edu.hk.
Jelena BeševićNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; UK Biobank, Stockport, United Kingdom.
Megan ConroyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; UK Biobank, Stockport, United Kingdom.
Wemimo OmiyaleNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; UK Biobank, Stockport, United Kingdom.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, NSW, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ben LaceyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; UK Biobank, Stockport, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ben.lacey@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
Naomi AllenNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; UK Biobank, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe independent effect of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and body fat percentage (BF%) on ischemic cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains uncertain.

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the independent associations of WHtR and BF% with ischemic CVD.

methodsThis prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank. BF% was calculated as fat mass divided by body weight, measured by bioimpedance. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall and sex-specific associations of BF% and WHtR with risks of ischemic CVD and its main subtypes [myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS)], adjusted for a range of potential confounders, including mutual adjustment for BF% and WHtR.

resultsIn total, 468,333 participants without existing CVD were included in the analysis. During 12 y of follow-up, 20,151 ischemic CVD events, 13,604 MIs, and 6681 ISs were recorded. WHtR was linearly associated with ischemic CVD, MI, and IS, with an HR per 5% increase of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.20, 1.25), 1.24 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.27), and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.26), respectively, independent of BF%. A stronger association between WHtR and MI was seen in females than in males. The association of BF% with these outcomes was substantially attenuated in both sexes after adjustment for WHtR. For example, in females, the HR (highest compared with lowest fifth) was reduced from 1.94 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.15) to 1.04 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.01) for ischemic CVD, from 2.04 (95% CI: 1.79, 2.32) to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.16) for MI, and from 1.81 (95% CI: 1.54, 2.13) to 1.07 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.33) for IS.

conclusionsWHtR, when used as a proxy measure for central obesity, is linearly associated with ischemic CVD in both sexes, which is independent of BF%. In contrast, the relationship of BF% with these health outcomes is predominantly driven by its correlation with WHtR.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueBiological Specimen BanksWaist-Height RatioAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited Kingdombody fat percentageischemic cardiovascular diseasesischemic strokemyocardial infarctionUK Biobankwaist-to-height ratio

Identifiers

PMID38839194
PMCPMC11196863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.