Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839120›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine technology2024

A Survey of Patient Experience During Molecular Breast Imaging.

Carrie B Hruska, Lacey R Gray, Sarah M Jenkins, Emily A Block, Katie N Hunt, Amy Lynn Conners, Shannon N Zingula, Michael K O'Connor, Deborah J Rhodes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Concepts in Molecular Breast Imaging.Journal of breast imaging · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carrie B HruskaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; hruska.carrie@mayo.edu.
Lacey R GrayDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah M JenkinsDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Emily A BlockDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Katie N HuntDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amy Lynn ConnersDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shannon N ZingulaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael K O'ConnorDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Deborah J RhodesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is one of several options available to patients seeking supplemental screening due to mammographically dense breasts. Patient experience during MBI may influence willingness to undergo the test but has yet to be formally assessed. We aimed to assess patient comfort level during MBI, to compare MBI comfort with mammography comfort, to identify factors associated with MBI discomfort, and to evaluate patients' willingness to return for future MBI.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescomfortmolecular breast imagingpatient experiencesurvey

Identifiers

PMID38839120
PMCPMC11149590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.