Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839076›Full record

ArticleMacromolecular rapid communications2024

A Computational Strategy for the Rapid Identification and Ranking of Patient-Specific T Cell Receptors Bound to Neoantigens.

Zachary A Rollins, Matthew B Curtis, Steven C George, Roland Faller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cancer vaccines: advances, hurdles, and future directions.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary A RollinsDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Bainer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Matthew B CurtisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, 451 E. Health Sciences Dr., GBSF 2303, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Steven C GeorgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, 451 E. Health Sciences Dr., GBSF 2303, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-1914
Roland FallerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Bainer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9946-3846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of a peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) is crucial for adaptive immune response. The identification of therapeutically relevant TCR-pMHC protein pairs is a bottleneck in the implementation of TCR-based immunotherapies. The ability to computationally design TCRs to target a specific pMHC requires automated integration of next-generation sequencing, protein-protein structure prediction, molecular dynamics, and TCR ranking. A pipeline to evaluate patient-specific, sequence-based TCRs to a target pMHC is presented. Using the three most frequently expressed TCRs from 16 colorectal cancer patients, the protein-protein structure of the TCRs to the target CEA peptide-MHC is predicted using Modeller and ColabFold. TCR-pMHC structures are compared using automated equilibration and successive analysis. ColabFold generated configurations require an ≈2.5× reduction in equilibration time of TCR-pMHC structures compared to Modeller. The structural differences between Modeller and ColabFold are demonstrated by root mean square deviation (≈0.20 nm) between clusters of equilibrated configurations, which impact the number of hydrogen bonds and Lennard-Jones contacts between the TCR and pMHC. TCR ranking criteria that may prioritize TCRs for evaluation of in vitro immunogenicity are identified, and this ranking is validated by comparing to state-of-the-art machine learning-based methods trained to predict the probability of TCR-pMHC binding.

Indexed as

Receptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, NeoplasmColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellmolecular dynamicsprotein structureT cells

Identifiers

PMID38839076
PMCPMC11661661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.