Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839060›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

The Role of e-Cigarette Packaging as a Health Communications Tool: A Focus Group Study With Adolescents and Adults in England and Scotland.

Daniel Jones, Amber Morgan, Crawford Moodie, Georgia Alexandrou, Allison Ford, Danielle Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel JonesInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-8735
Amber MorganInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-2518-6587
Crawford MoodieInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-2509
Georgia AlexandrouInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-8084-2116
Allison FordInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3624-6673
Danielle MitchellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8692-5407

Funding

Cancer Research UK PICATR-2021\100001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United Kingdom, e-cigarette and refill packaging must display a nicotine addiction warning. This study explored how this message is perceived, responses to alternative on-pack messages, and other options for using e-cigarette packaging to discourage youth and people who neither smoke nor use e-cigarettes while encouraging smokers to switch. AIMS AND

methodsBetween August and September 2022, 16 focus groups (n = 70) were conducted to explore these topics with adolescents (n = 31, aged 11-17 years) and adults (n = 39, nonsmokers, smokers that use e-cigarettes, smokers that do not use e-cigarettes) in England and Scotland.

resultsWhile several participants thought the current nicotine addiction warning could help increase awareness of nicotine addiction, most reported that it failed to capture attention and was not a deterrent. Alternative messages shown on packs (about harm, toxicity, wellness, litter, or relative risk) received mixed responses. Relative risk messages were perceived as most beneficial for smokers switching but also thought to potentially encourage uptake among nonsmokers. Some participants considered certain harm and toxicity messages to potentially dissuade uptake. Participants proposed several ideas to reduce the appeal of e-cigarette packaging and devices to deter youth uptake, including more prominent warnings, standardized packaging, and devices that are plain or include health messages.

conclusionsPackaging can play a crucial role in communicating product and health messages to different consumer groups. Further consideration of how packaging and labeling can meet the needs of non-nicotine users while simultaneously reaching those who may benefit from using e-cigarettes to stop smoking is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: While some viewed the nicotine addiction warning required on e-cigarettes and refill packaging in the United Kingdom as helpful in raising awareness of nicotine addiction, it did not resonate with most of our sample of adolescents and adults. The findings suggest that e-cigarette packaging could be better used to encourage smokers to switch to a less harmful alternative, with relative risk messages showing promise. Furthermore, strengthening on-pack messaging (eg increasing salience and rotating messages) and reducing the appeal of packaging (eg drab colors) and devices (eg including warnings) may help increase awareness of e-cigarette harms while deterring use among adolescents and nonsmokers.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth CommunicationProduct PackagingAdolescentAdultChildEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleProduct LabelingScotlandSmokersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38839060
PMCPMC11931217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.