Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38838498›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2024

Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.

F Marmé, M Martin, M Untch, C Thode, H Bonnefoi, S-B Kim, H Bear, N Mc Carthy, K Gelmon, J A García-Sáenz and 12 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. [Fertility management in breast cancer patients: current strategies and research advances].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

F MarméMedical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: talonso@salud.madrid.org.
M MartinInstituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
M UntchHelios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin.
C ThodeAmedes MVZ Wagnerstibbe für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Göttingen, Germany.
H BonnefoiInstitut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France.
S-B KimSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
H BearDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Health, Richmond, USA.
N Mc CarthyBreast Cancer Trials Australia and New Zealand and University of Queensland, Icon Cancer Centre Wesley, Auchenflower, Australia.
K GelmonBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
J A García-SáenzService de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
C M KellyMater Private Hospital, Dublin and Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland.
T ReimerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
O ValotaPfizer Srl, Milan, Italy.
M ToiBreast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
H S RugoUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA.
M GnantComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
A MakrisInstitute of Cancer Research, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
M BassyAmedes MVZ Wagnerstibbe für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Göttingen, Germany.
Z ZhangPfizer Inc, San Diego, USA.
J FurlanettoGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
V NekljudovaGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
S LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/GBG_Forschung.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PENELOPE-B study demonstrated that the addition of 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo. Here, we report results for premenopausal women. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC at high risk of relapse [defined as no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a clinical, pathological stage, estrogen receptor, grading (CPS-EG) score ≥3 or 2/ypN+] were randomized to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib or placebo + standard ET. Ovarian function (OF) was evaluated by centrally assessed estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels.

resultsOverall, 616 of 1250 randomized patients were premenopausal; of these, 30.0% were <40 years of age, 47.4% had four or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 58.2% had a CPS-EG score ≥3. 66.1% of patients were treated with tamoxifen alone, and 32.9% received ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (AI). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (97.2% completeness) no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo was observed [hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.30, P = 0.737]. The estimated 3-year iDFS rate was marginally higher in the palbociclib arm (80.6% versus 78.3%). Three year iDFS was higher in patients receiving AI than tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone (86.0% versus 78.6% versus 78.0%). Patients receiving tamoxifen plus OFS showed a favorable iDFS with palbociclib (83.0% versus 74.1%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, P = 0.057). Hematologic adverse events were more frequent with palbociclib (76.1% versus 1.9% grade 3-4, P < 0.001). Palbociclib seems not to negatively impact the OF throughout the treatment period.

conclusionsIn premenopausal women, who received tamoxifen plus OFS as ET, the addition of palbociclib to ET results in a favorable iDFS. The safety profile seems favorable and in contrast to chemotherapy palbociclib does not impact OF throughout the treatment period.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoadjuvant TherapyPiperazinesPremenopausePyridinesAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespalbociclibPiperazinesPyridinesReceptors, Estrogenadjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitorearly breast cancerHER2 negativehormone receptor positiveovarian functionpalbociclibPENELOPE-Bpremenopausal

Identifiers

PMID38838498
PMCPMC11190462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.