Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38838462›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2024

Scenario design for infectious disease projections: Integrating concepts from decision analysis and experimental design.

Michael C Runge, Katriona Shea, Emily Howerton, Katie Yan, Harry Hochheiser, Erik Rosenstrom, William J M Probert, Rebecca Borchering, Madhav V Marathe, Bryan Lewis and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael C RungeU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Patuxent Research Refuge, Laurel, MD, USA. Electronic address: mrunge@usgs.gov.
Katriona SheaThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Emily HowertonThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Katie YanThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Harry HochheiserUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erik RosenstromNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
William J M ProbertUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rebecca BorcheringThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Madhav V MaratheUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Bryan LewisUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Srinivasan VenkatramananUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Shaun TrueloveJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Justin LesslerThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cécile ViboudFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

MIDAS Coordination CenterU24GM132013 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOCHHEISER, HARRY S · 2019 to 2023
$8.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TW999999NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM132013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across many fields, scenario modeling has become an important tool for exploring long-term projections and how they might depend on potential interventions and critical uncertainties, with relevance to both decision makers and scientists. In the past decade, and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, the field of epidemiology has seen substantial growth in the use of scenario projections. Multiple scenarios are often projected at the same time, allowing important comparisons that can guide the choice of intervention, the prioritization of research topics, or public communication. The design of the scenarios is central to their ability to inform important questions. In this paper, we draw on the fields of decision analysis and statistical design of experiments to propose a framework for scenario design in epidemiology, with relevance also to other fields. We identify six different fundamental purposes for scenario designs (decision making, sensitivity analysis, situational awareness, horizon scanning, forecasting, and value of information) and discuss how those purposes guide the structure of scenarios. We discuss other aspects of the content and process of scenario design, broadly for all settings and specifically for multi-model ensemble projections. As an illustrative case study, we examine the first 17 rounds of scenarios from the U.S. COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub, then reflect on future advancements that could improve the design of scenarios in epidemiological settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision Support TechniquesCommunicable DiseasesDecision MakingForecastingHumansPandemicsResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2Design of experimentsMulti-model projectionsScenario modelingSensitivity analysisValue of information

Identifiers

PMID38838462
PMCPMC12444779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.